https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195548 Where a refund granted earlier had already been set aside by the Tribunal, and no subsisting legal entitlement to retain the amount was shown, the HC held that the endorsement refusing retention was justified and sustained it. On instalments, the petitioner was not granted direct relief but was permitted to submit a representation to the competent authority, which was directed to consider the request in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 26 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Nov 2017 15:21:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195548 Where a refund granted earlier had already been set aside by the Tribunal, and no subsisting legal entitlement to retain the amount was shown, the HC held that the endorsement refusing retention was justified and sustained it. On instalments, the petitioner was not granted direct relief but was permitted to submit a representation to the competent authority, which was directed to consider the request in accordance with law. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195548