<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 199 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350320</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 32 lakhs under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee satisfactorily explained the sources of cash deposits. However, the disallowance of the interest adjustment of Rs. 9,87,295 was upheld, as there was no nexus between the remuneration received and the capital contribution for business purposes. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 2nd November 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 199 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350320</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 32 lakhs under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as the assessee satisfactorily explained the sources of cash deposits. However, the disallowance of the interest adjustment of Rs. 9,87,295 was upheld, as there was no nexus between the remuneration received and the capital contribution for business purposes. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 2nd November 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>