<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 188 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350309</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding that it was automatically imposed without establishing deliberate concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The penalty under Section 271(1)(b) was also deleted due to reasonable cause for non-compliance with notices. Both penalties were overturned, and the judgment was pronounced on 31st October 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 188 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350309</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding that it was automatically imposed without establishing deliberate concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The penalty under Section 271(1)(b) was also deleted due to reasonable cause for non-compliance with notices. Both penalties were overturned, and the judgment was pronounced on 31st October 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>