<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 176 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350297</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal by upholding the deletion of the addition towards the variation in closing stock. The issue of suppression of sales and unexplained investment in purchases was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration based on the revised VAT returns. The assessments made under Section 153A were deemed valid, and the CIT(A)&#039;s approach of considering both legal and merit grounds was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 10:52:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 176 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350297</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal by upholding the deletion of the addition towards the variation in closing stock. The issue of suppression of sales and unexplained investment in purchases was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration based on the revised VAT returns. The assessments made under Section 153A were deemed valid, and the CIT(A)&#039;s approach of considering both legal and merit grounds was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>