https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350290 The case involved the confiscation of gold under the Customs Act, 1962, where the appellant claimed legitimate purchase with proper documentation. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of thorough investigation, cross-checking evidence, and not solely relying on confessional statements. It noted the importance of verifying documents and conducting detailed examinations. The Tribunal found the appellant's evidence credible, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeals, as the referenced judicial precedent was not directly applicable to the case. en-us Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350290 The case involved the confiscation of gold under the Customs Act, 1962, where the appellant claimed legitimate purchase with proper documentation. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of thorough investigation, cross-checking evidence, and not solely relying on confessional statements. It noted the importance of verifying documents and conducting detailed examinations. The Tribunal found the appellant's evidence credible, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeals, as the referenced judicial precedent was not directly applicable to the case. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350290