https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350284 The tribunal dismissed the petitioner's claims of oppression and mismanagement in the company, citing discrepancies in promised shareholding and lack of evidence supporting the allegations. Despite allowing the option to sell shares at fair market value, the tribunal emphasized the need for civil court intervention for certain matters. Both parties were directed to bear their own costs, with the judgment noting the petitioner's lack of bona fide intentions in filing the petition, suggesting personal grievances as the true motive. en-us Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Nov 2017 10:14:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350284 The tribunal dismissed the petitioner's claims of oppression and mismanagement in the company, citing discrepancies in promised shareholding and lack of evidence supporting the allegations. Despite allowing the option to sell shares at fair market value, the tribunal emphasized the need for civil court intervention for certain matters. Both parties were directed to bear their own costs, with the judgment noting the petitioner's lack of bona fide intentions in filing the petition, suggesting personal grievances as the true motive. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350284