<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 158 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350279</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of Service Tax on Cargo Handling Service, Construction of Residential Complex Service, Commercial &amp;amp; Industrial Construction Service, and Maintenance &amp;amp; Repair Service along with interest for the normal period of limitation. The appellant&#039;s payment of Rs. 2,03,476/- on CHP maintenance work was upheld. The demand of Service Tax on other issues and the imposition of penalties were set aside. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2020 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 158 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350279</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of Service Tax on Cargo Handling Service, Construction of Residential Complex Service, Commercial &amp;amp; Industrial Construction Service, and Maintenance &amp;amp; Repair Service along with interest for the normal period of limitation. The appellant&#039;s payment of Rs. 2,03,476/- on CHP maintenance work was upheld. The demand of Service Tax on other issues and the imposition of penalties were set aside. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>