https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7691 Whether a third member appointed under section 255(4) must confine itself to answering specific referred points so that a majority can be formed, rather than rehearing the entire appeal or declining to answer questions. The referring member is under a statutory duty to decide the referred points in one way or another; answering incompletely or recharacterising the reference as a full rehearing misconceives the member's coordinate role and frustrates the majority-decision mechanism. en-us Fri, 03 Nov 2017 09:55:41 +0530 Fri, 03 Nov 2017 09:55:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7691 Whether a third member appointed under section 255(4) must confine itself to answering specific referred points so that a majority can be formed, rather than rehearing the entire appeal or declining to answer questions. The referring member is under a statutory duty to decide the referred points in one way or another; answering incompletely or recharacterising the reference as a full rehearing misconceives the member's coordinate role and frustrates the majority-decision mechanism. Articles Income Tax Fri, 03 Nov 2017 09:55:41 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7691