<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 329 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195536</link>
    <description>The appeal for assessment year 2003-04 was dismissed as a duplicate since another appeal with identical grounds was already pending. However, the appeal for assessment year 2002-03 was partly allowed by the Tribunal, which recalled the earlier order to consider a relevant judgment and ultimately decided the issue against the assessee regarding computing deductions under sections 10A/10B. The order was pronounced on January 18, 2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 18:43:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 329 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195536</link>
      <description>The appeal for assessment year 2003-04 was dismissed as a duplicate since another appeal with identical grounds was already pending. However, the appeal for assessment year 2002-03 was partly allowed by the Tribunal, which recalled the earlier order to consider a relevant judgment and ultimately decided the issue against the assessee regarding computing deductions under sections 10A/10B. The order was pronounced on January 18, 2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>