<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1476 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195518</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA denied an adjournment request by respondents and proceeded to hear appeals related to the confiscation of goods found in excess on a foreign vessel at Haldia dock. Penalties were imposed on the Master of the vessel and two shipping agencies under the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal dismissed appeals filed by the respondents and granted relief to the Revenue regarding the validity of the Commissioner&#039;s order and penalty imposition. However, the request for imposing penalties on an individual not party to the appeal was not granted, as penalties were already imposed on the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 17:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1476 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195518</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA denied an adjournment request by respondents and proceeded to hear appeals related to the confiscation of goods found in excess on a foreign vessel at Haldia dock. Penalties were imposed on the Master of the vessel and two shipping agencies under the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal dismissed appeals filed by the respondents and granted relief to the Revenue regarding the validity of the Commissioner&#039;s order and penalty imposition. However, the request for imposing penalties on an individual not party to the appeal was not granted, as penalties were already imposed on the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>