https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195521 The Tribunal set aside the denial of cenvat credit on most services, except for specific cases, and partially allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant. The imposition of a penalty was deemed unwarranted as the issue revolved around the interpretation of cenvat credit eligibility. The Tribunal found that all services, except for residence telephone service and PF/EPF collection service, were admissible as eligible input services, based on judicial precedence and previous orders. en-us Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Nov 2017 17:36:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195521 The Tribunal set aside the denial of cenvat credit on most services, except for specific cases, and partially allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant. The imposition of a penalty was deemed unwarranted as the issue revolved around the interpretation of cenvat credit eligibility. The Tribunal found that all services, except for residence telephone service and PF/EPF collection service, were admissible as eligible input services, based on judicial precedence and previous orders. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195521