<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1155 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195526</link>
    <description>The winding up petition against the Respondent Company for unpaid consultancy fees was dismissed by the Court. The Court found that the dispute over the fees was a bonafide one, warranting resolution through arbitration as per the arbitration clause in the Agreement. The Company&#039;s contention of non-compliance by the Petitioner and the lack of acknowledgment of the disputed amount led to the dismissal of the petition. No costs were awarded, emphasizing the need for resolving genuine disputes through arbitration rather than winding up proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 17:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1155 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195526</link>
      <description>The winding up petition against the Respondent Company for unpaid consultancy fees was dismissed by the Court. The Court found that the dispute over the fees was a bonafide one, warranting resolution through arbitration as per the arbitration clause in the Agreement. The Company&#039;s contention of non-compliance by the Petitioner and the lack of acknowledgment of the disputed amount led to the dismissal of the petition. No costs were awarded, emphasizing the need for resolving genuine disputes through arbitration rather than winding up proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>