https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195527 The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order and set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in an appeal by the Revenue. The case involved the denial of Cenvat Credit to a cement manufacturer for removing inputs without reversing the credit, leading to evasion of excise duty payment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper declaration and compliance with excise duty regulations, rejecting the respondent's reliance on a previous Tribunal decision. The appeal was allowed, highlighting the necessity of adhering to legal requirements. en-us Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Nov 2017 17:36:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195527 The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order and set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in an appeal by the Revenue. The case involved the denial of Cenvat Credit to a cement manufacturer for removing inputs without reversing the credit, leading to evasion of excise duty payment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper declaration and compliance with excise duty regulations, rejecting the respondent's reliance on a previous Tribunal decision. The appeal was allowed, highlighting the necessity of adhering to legal requirements. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195527