<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1122 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195516</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the imposition of penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, in an appeal by a partnership firm providing security services. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s genuine belief, non-disputed partial payment made promptly after the notice, and lack of justification for penalty imposition. The Tribunal invoked section 80 to waive the penalty, emphasizing the importance of a fair and reasonable approach in tax adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 17:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1122 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195516</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the imposition of penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, in an appeal by a partnership firm providing security services. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s genuine belief, non-disputed partial payment made promptly after the notice, and lack of justification for penalty imposition. The Tribunal invoked section 80 to waive the penalty, emphasizing the importance of a fair and reasonable approach in tax adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>