<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 958 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195506</link>
    <description>Pending revision of the CEGAT order by the High Court, the lower authority&#039;s order could not be enforced against the assessee. On that basis, the request for stay was rejected, leaving the enforcement position dependent on the appellate revision process rather than immediate implementation of the subordinate order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 11:00:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 958 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195506</link>
      <description>Pending revision of the CEGAT order by the High Court, the lower authority&#039;s order could not be enforced against the assessee. On that basis, the request for stay was rejected, leaving the enforcement position dependent on the appellate revision process rather than immediate implementation of the subordinate order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>