<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 126 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350247</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the ITAT order for AY 2011-12 concerning disallowance under Section 14A. The Court held that the disallowance should be limited to the expenditure related to tax-exempt income, not the entire tax-exempt income itself. The Court emphasized the need for the AO to provide reasons for rejecting the assessee&#039;s claim and ensure proportionality in the disallowance. The appeal was decided in favor of the Assessee, with the Court ruling against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 08:15:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 126 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350247</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the ITAT order for AY 2011-12 concerning disallowance under Section 14A. The Court held that the disallowance should be limited to the expenditure related to tax-exempt income, not the entire tax-exempt income itself. The Court emphasized the need for the AO to provide reasons for rejecting the assessee&#039;s claim and ensure proportionality in the disallowance. The appeal was decided in favor of the Assessee, with the Court ruling against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>