<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 116 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350237</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the deduction under section 80IB(10) for the entire project. The ITAT upheld the pro-rata deduction for units that complied with the conditions of section 80IB(10). The ITAT&#039;s decision was based on the exclusion of architectural projections from the built-up area calculations and previous judicial decisions supporting pro-rata deductions. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 08:03:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 116 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350237</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to grant the deduction under section 80IB(10) for the entire project. The ITAT upheld the pro-rata deduction for units that complied with the conditions of section 80IB(10). The ITAT&#039;s decision was based on the exclusion of architectural projections from the built-up area calculations and previous judicial decisions supporting pro-rata deductions. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>