<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 112 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350233</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals for both AY 2006-07 and AY 2007-08, directing the deletion of the disallowance under section 40A(3) due to the absence of incriminating material and the genuineness of the payments. The assessment orders were found to be without jurisdiction and not sustainable, leading to the appeals being allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 07:58:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 112 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350233</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals for both AY 2006-07 and AY 2007-08, directing the deletion of the disallowance under section 40A(3) due to the absence of incriminating material and the genuineness of the payments. The assessment orders were found to be without jurisdiction and not sustainable, leading to the appeals being allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>