<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 111 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350232</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings as the reopening was beyond the permissible period and there was no failure to disclose material facts. The Tribunal held the reopening was without jurisdiction, citing the first proviso to section 147, and ruled in favor of the assessee. The reassessment was deemed barred by limitation, and the order was pronounced on 05-07-2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 07:57:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 111 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350232</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings as the reopening was beyond the permissible period and there was no failure to disclose material facts. The Tribunal held the reopening was without jurisdiction, citing the first proviso to section 147, and ruled in favor of the assessee. The reassessment was deemed barred by limitation, and the order was pronounced on 05-07-2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>