<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 104 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350225</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner&#039;s application for the Form-G identity card and make a decision based on Regulation 17(4) within eight weeks. The judgment emphasized the importance of following legal principles and precedents in determining licensing eligibility, ensuring fairness and consistency in licensing processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 104 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350225</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner&#039;s application for the Form-G identity card and make a decision based on Regulation 17(4) within eight weeks. The judgment emphasized the importance of following legal principles and precedents in determining licensing eligibility, ensuring fairness and consistency in licensing processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>