<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1473 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195503</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the provisional assessment of imported goods and the extension of the period for issuing the Show Cause Notice under the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to seize the goods under Section 110(1) for violations and extend the period for issuing the Show Cause Notice under Section 124(a) was found to be valid, with no infirmity in the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 07:34:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1473 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195503</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the provisional assessment of imported goods and the extension of the period for issuing the Show Cause Notice under the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner&#039;s decision to seize the goods under Section 110(1) for violations and extend the period for issuing the Show Cause Notice under Section 124(a) was found to be valid, with no infirmity in the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>