<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1474 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195504</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the liability of additional duty of Customs on imported ball bearings removed to a different unit within the country. The appellant&#039;s plea of bonafide belief was not substantiated with evidence, leading to the imposition of penalty under Rule 15(2) of CCR, 2004 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant was granted the option to pay a reduced penalty of 25% of the duty within a specified period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 07:34:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1474 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195504</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the liability of additional duty of Customs on imported ball bearings removed to a different unit within the country. The appellant&#039;s plea of bonafide belief was not substantiated with evidence, leading to the imposition of penalty under Rule 15(2) of CCR, 2004 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant was granted the option to pay a reduced penalty of 25% of the duty within a specified period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>