https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350200 The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the attachment of bank accounts by the third respondent, ruling that the petition was not maintainable before the court due to jurisdictional issues. The petitioners were directed to submit objections and relevant documents to prove their non-liability for Central Excise Duty or penalties. The court emphasized that the petitioners should address their concerns before the third respondent for proper consideration in accordance with the law. No costs were awarded, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed. en-us Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Nov 2017 07:34:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350200 The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the attachment of bank accounts by the third respondent, ruling that the petition was not maintainable before the court due to jurisdictional issues. The petitioners were directed to submit objections and relevant documents to prove their non-liability for Central Excise Duty or penalties. The court emphasized that the petitioners should address their concerns before the third respondent for proper consideration in accordance with the law. No costs were awarded, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350200