<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1298 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195496</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication to determine if the commodity transactions were derivatives exempt from TDS requirements under section 194H. The judgment clarified the scope of TDS provisions for commission or brokerage payments related to securities, emphasizing the distinction for derivatives transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 18:18:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1298 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195496</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication to determine if the commodity transactions were derivatives exempt from TDS requirements under section 194H. The judgment clarified the scope of TDS provisions for commission or brokerage payments related to securities, emphasizing the distinction for derivatives transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>