<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1215 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195489</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal for Assessment Year 2005-06, disallowing depreciation on the BSE Card but upholding the deletion of disallowance on VSAT/leaseline charges. The decision was based on legal interpretations and precedents, ensuring compliance with the IT Act provisions under section 40(a)(ia).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 17:21:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1215 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195489</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal for Assessment Year 2005-06, disallowing depreciation on the BSE Card but upholding the deletion of disallowance on VSAT/leaseline charges. The decision was based on legal interpretations and precedents, ensuring compliance with the IT Act provisions under section 40(a)(ia).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>