https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195484 A landlord-company's genuine and reasonable need for premises was treated as its own occupation where space was required for its departments and for entities wholly under its control. The court held that Section 13(1)(ff) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act was satisfied because legal possession and effective control remained with the landlord, and the use of controlled companies did not defeat the claim. The tenant's objections based on alleged alternative accommodation and evidentiary inadequacy failed because the accommodation was part of the landlord's controlled arrangement and the point had not been effectively challenged at trial. Mesne profits were also quantified on the existing record without further reference. en-us Sat, 07 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Nov 2017 14:51:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195484 A landlord-company's genuine and reasonable need for premises was treated as its own occupation where space was required for its departments and for entities wholly under its control. The court held that Section 13(1)(ff) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act was satisfied because legal possession and effective control remained with the landlord, and the use of controlled companies did not defeat the claim. The tenant's objections based on alleged alternative accommodation and evidentiary inadequacy failed because the accommodation was part of the landlord's controlled arrangement and the point had not been effectively challenged at trial. Mesne profits were also quantified on the existing record without further reference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 07 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195484