<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 78 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350199</link>
    <description>SC held that amounts paid as mobilisation/demobilisation under contracts for mineral oil operations constitute profits and gains of business and are taxable under s.44BB read with ss.5 and 9, because such payments are not mere reimbursements and are treated as income earned in India; the assessments by the AO were upheld and the assessees&#039; appeals dismissed. In the separate appeal by the revenue, the HC was affirmed: compensation for tools lost by the contractor paid by the procurer did not fall within s.44BB.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 78 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350199</link>
      <description>SC held that amounts paid as mobilisation/demobilisation under contracts for mineral oil operations constitute profits and gains of business and are taxable under s.44BB read with ss.5 and 9, because such payments are not mere reimbursements and are treated as income earned in India; the assessments by the AO were upheld and the assessees&#039; appeals dismissed. In the separate appeal by the revenue, the HC was affirmed: compensation for tools lost by the contractor paid by the procurer did not fall within s.44BB.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>