<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 68 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350189</link>
    <description>The assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed, and the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed. The Tribunal relied on precedents from AY 2004-05, resulting in the deletion of various additions made by the AO. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to reasonable cause. Discrepancies in opening balances were partially sustained, but other additions for unexplained credits and disallowances were mostly deleted based on previous decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 13:58:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 68 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350189</link>
      <description>The assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed, and the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed. The Tribunal relied on precedents from AY 2004-05, resulting in the deletion of various additions made by the AO. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to reasonable cause. Discrepancies in opening balances were partially sustained, but other additions for unexplained credits and disallowances were mostly deleted based on previous decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>