<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 58 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350179</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12 on multiple grounds, while partially allowing the appeals for statistical purposes. The revenue&#039;s appeals for the same assessment years were also dismissed. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the treatment of various receipts and expenses, emphasizing the distinction between core and non-core income activities as defined in the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 13:06:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 58 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350179</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12 on multiple grounds, while partially allowing the appeals for statistical purposes. The revenue&#039;s appeals for the same assessment years were also dismissed. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the treatment of various receipts and expenses, emphasizing the distinction between core and non-core income activities as defined in the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>