<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 41 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350162</link>
    <description>The Application was allowed, permitting the addition of Respondents No. 5 and 6 and the filing of Consent Letters as part of the main petition. The Tribunal emphasized that the proposed amendments did not alter the cause of action or prejudice the Respondents, and the issue of limitation did not bar the amendments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:39:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 41 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350162</link>
      <description>The Application was allowed, permitting the addition of Respondents No. 5 and 6 and the filing of Consent Letters as part of the main petition. The Tribunal emphasized that the proposed amendments did not alter the cause of action or prejudice the Respondents, and the issue of limitation did not bar the amendments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>