<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 33 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350154</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties and directing a reevaluation of the credit liability for the period before 01.04.2008. The judgment emphasized the importance of clarity and thorough verification in cases involving the disallowance of CENVAT credit on input services used for both taxable and exempted output services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 18:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 33 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350154</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties and directing a reevaluation of the credit liability for the period before 01.04.2008. The judgment emphasized the importance of clarity and thorough verification in cases involving the disallowance of CENVAT credit on input services used for both taxable and exempted output services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>