https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350153 The Tribunal dismissed the rectification application seeking correction of a Final Order, stating that no error of law was apparent on the face of the record. It was determined that the application aimed at challenging the Final Order's merits rather than rectifying a clear mistake. The denial of credit based on invoices in individuals' names was upheld, emphasizing that the rectification application exceeded the Tribunal's jurisdiction. The application was dismissed, with the Tribunal highlighting that the modifications sought related to the case's substance, falling outside the scope of rectification proceedings. en-us Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:18:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350153 The Tribunal dismissed the rectification application seeking correction of a Final Order, stating that no error of law was apparent on the face of the record. It was determined that the application aimed at challenging the Final Order's merits rather than rectifying a clear mistake. The denial of credit based on invoices in individuals' names was upheld, emphasizing that the rectification application exceeded the Tribunal's jurisdiction. The application was dismissed, with the Tribunal highlighting that the modifications sought related to the case's substance, falling outside the scope of rectification proceedings. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350153