https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350140 The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant, setting aside the duty demand and penalties imposed. It ruled that selling goods with a customer's brand name/logo does not constitute manufacturing by the appellant. The duty demand on goods beyond the appellant's manufacturing capacity was deemed unjustified. Additionally, the time-barred duty demand was not addressed as the initial demand lacked merit. The Tribunal emphasized the need for valid grounds and evidence to support duty demands, ultimately overturning both the duty demand and penalties. en-us Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:11:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350140 The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant, setting aside the duty demand and penalties imposed. It ruled that selling goods with a customer's brand name/logo does not constitute manufacturing by the appellant. The duty demand on goods beyond the appellant's manufacturing capacity was deemed unjustified. Additionally, the time-barred duty demand was not addressed as the initial demand lacked merit. The Tribunal emphasized the need for valid grounds and evidence to support duty demands, ultimately overturning both the duty demand and penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350140