<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 10 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350131</link>
    <description>Notification No. 50/2003-CE was applied on a unit-wise basis rather than as a factory-wide exemption, because the scheme was framed for new industrial units or existing units undertaking substantial expansion. The expressions &quot;factory&quot; and &quot;industrial unit&quot; were treated as distinct, and identifiable sections of a factory carrying separate manufacture could qualify as separate units for the notification. The wider definition of &quot;factory&quot; under the Central Excise Act could not override this unit-based design. Following the assessee&#039;s earlier case, denial of the benefit on a factory-wide approach was unsustainable, and the exemption was held available unit-wise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 10:53:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 10 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350131</link>
      <description>Notification No. 50/2003-CE was applied on a unit-wise basis rather than as a factory-wide exemption, because the scheme was framed for new industrial units or existing units undertaking substantial expansion. The expressions &quot;factory&quot; and &quot;industrial unit&quot; were treated as distinct, and identifiable sections of a factory carrying separate manufacture could qualify as separate units for the notification. The wider definition of &quot;factory&quot; under the Central Excise Act could not override this unit-based design. Following the assessee&#039;s earlier case, denial of the benefit on a factory-wide approach was unsustainable, and the exemption was held available unit-wise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>