https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350122 A revision under the Uttarakhand VAT regime concerned security demanded for release of seized goods and the related question of liability to carry Form-16. The High Court confined the proceeding to the security requirement, noted that the Tribunal had already reduced the amount demanded, and declined to decide the substantive questions on maintainability, transporter status, and Form-16 obligations. Those legal issues were left open for consideration before the competent statutory authority in the pending proceedings, and the revision was dismissed. en-us Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Nov 2017 10:48:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350122 A revision under the Uttarakhand VAT regime concerned security demanded for release of seized goods and the related question of liability to carry Form-16. The High Court confined the proceeding to the security requirement, noted that the Tribunal had already reduced the amount demanded, and declined to decide the substantive questions on maintainability, transporter status, and Form-16 obligations. Those legal issues were left open for consideration before the competent statutory authority in the pending proceedings, and the revision was dismissed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350122