<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1326 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195473</link>
    <description>The court upheld the constitutional validity of the challenged provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, including amendments made by the 2013 Amendment Act. The court found the amendments aligned with international obligations and aimed at combating money laundering effectively. The petitions challenging various sections of the Act were dismissed, affirming the legality of the provisions under scrutiny.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 10:48:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1326 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195473</link>
      <description>The court upheld the constitutional validity of the challenged provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, including amendments made by the 2013 Amendment Act. The court found the amendments aligned with international obligations and aimed at combating money laundering effectively. The petitions challenging various sections of the Act were dismissed, affirming the legality of the provisions under scrutiny.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>