<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 62 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10396</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The salary paid to the partner was not deductible under section 40(b). The applicant was not entitled to benefits under sections 80HH and 80J as the cold storage plant did not qualify as manufacturing or producing articles. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 62 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10396</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The salary paid to the partner was not deductible under section 40(b). The applicant was not entitled to benefits under sections 80HH and 80J as the cold storage plant did not qualify as manufacturing or producing articles. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>