https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195461 The High Court dismissed respondent No.2's objections regarding the sale of the property in execution of the decree. The Court found the objections invalid, allowing the auction to proceed to satisfy the decree in favor of the appellant. Additionally, the Court determined that the actions of the Managing Director of the company, who purchased the property and engaged in deceptive conduct, did not prevent the auction of the property for decree satisfaction. en-us Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Oct 2017 16:03:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195461 The High Court dismissed respondent No.2's objections regarding the sale of the property in execution of the decree. The Court found the objections invalid, allowing the auction to proceed to satisfy the decree in favor of the appellant. Additionally, the Court determined that the actions of the Managing Director of the company, who purchased the property and engaged in deceptive conduct, did not prevent the auction of the property for decree satisfaction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195461