<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1272 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350117</link>
    <description>Penalties were held unsustainable where export goods stuffed under official supervision in a sealed container were later substituted without the appellants&#039; involvement. The record showed that the driver diverted the container, broke the seal at a godown, replaced the declared glass tumblers with red sanders, and resealed it with a look-alike seal. Statements of the supervising officers and the driver supported this sequence. The appellants&#039; alleged failure to verify the overseas buyer or remittance did not establish participation in, or complicity with, the smuggling transaction, so penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1272 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350117</link>
      <description>Penalties were held unsustainable where export goods stuffed under official supervision in a sealed container were later substituted without the appellants&#039; involvement. The record showed that the driver diverted the container, broke the seal at a godown, replaced the declared glass tumblers with red sanders, and resealed it with a look-alike seal. Statements of the supervising officers and the driver supported this sequence. The appellants&#039; alleged failure to verify the overseas buyer or remittance did not establish participation in, or complicity with, the smuggling transaction, so penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>