<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1267 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350112</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the revocation of the appellant&#039;s Customs Broker license and imposing a monetary penalty of Rs. 50,000 along with forfeiture of the security deposit for regulatory breaches under the CBLR 2013. The decision considered the severity of the penalty, deeming license revocation excessive. The appellant was found guilty of violations related to import irregularities and misuse of IEC Code but was granted a more proportionate penalty instead of license revocation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1267 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350112</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the revocation of the appellant&#039;s Customs Broker license and imposing a monetary penalty of Rs. 50,000 along with forfeiture of the security deposit for regulatory breaches under the CBLR 2013. The decision considered the severity of the penalty, deeming license revocation excessive. The appellant was found guilty of violations related to import irregularities and misuse of IEC Code but was granted a more proportionate penalty instead of license revocation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>