<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1265 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350110</link>
    <description>Benefit of exemption from Special Additional Duty under Notification No. 30/2004-CE was available to importers of 100% polyester knitted fabrics, because the Supreme Court had already held that the condition relating to non-availment of credit could not be applied to imported goods in that manner. The Tribunal further held that the mere pendency of a review petition did not justify departure from that binding ruling, as there was no stay or allowance of the review. The Revenue&#039;s objection was therefore rejected and the exemption extended to the importers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 15:15:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1265 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350110</link>
      <description>Benefit of exemption from Special Additional Duty under Notification No. 30/2004-CE was available to importers of 100% polyester knitted fabrics, because the Supreme Court had already held that the condition relating to non-availment of credit could not be applied to imported goods in that manner. The Tribunal further held that the mere pendency of a review petition did not justify departure from that binding ruling, as there was no stay or allowance of the review. The Revenue&#039;s objection was therefore rejected and the exemption extended to the importers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>