<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1224 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195454</link>
    <description>Further investigation under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not nullify an earlier charge-sheet filed under Section 173(2). Where the charge-sheet in the original FIR was filed within time, default bail under Section 167(2) cannot be claimed by linking the request to a later CBI investigation arising from the court-directed further inquiry. The later fresh FIR and further report were treated as part of the continuing investigative process, not as rejection or quashing of the earlier report. Delay in trial also did not aid the petitioner because it was attributable to a co-accused, and relief was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 15:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1224 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195454</link>
      <description>Further investigation under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not nullify an earlier charge-sheet filed under Section 173(2). Where the charge-sheet in the original FIR was filed within time, default bail under Section 167(2) cannot be claimed by linking the request to a later CBI investigation arising from the court-directed further inquiry. The later fresh FIR and further report were treated as part of the continuing investigative process, not as rejection or quashing of the earlier report. Delay in trial also did not aid the petitioner because it was attributable to a co-accused, and relief was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>