https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350079 The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against the applicant, citing the failure to initially implead the company as an accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court set aside the Trial Court's decision to allow the company's impleadment at a later stage, emphasizing the necessity of complying with procedural requirements. The applications to implead the company under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C were rejected, affirming that belated impleadment to rectify initial defects was impermissible. en-us Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Oct 2017 12:05:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350079 The High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against the applicant, citing the failure to initially implead the company as an accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court set aside the Trial Court's decision to allow the company's impleadment at a later stage, emphasizing the necessity of complying with procedural requirements. The applications to implead the company under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C were rejected, affirming that belated impleadment to rectify initial defects was impermissible. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350079