<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 49 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10389</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the legality of notices for reopening assessments under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court directed the respondents to furnish reasons for reopening and allowed the petitioner to file objections. Despite objections raised by the petitioner, the court upheld the order/communication dated September 27, 2004, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements and the assessee&#039;s right to challenge the order&#039;s correctness in the future. The court stressed providing fair opportunities for the assessee throughout the assessment process and allowed the respondents to proceed in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 49 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10389</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the legality of notices for reopening assessments under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court directed the respondents to furnish reasons for reopening and allowed the petitioner to file objections. Despite objections raised by the petitioner, the court upheld the order/communication dated September 27, 2004, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements and the assessee&#039;s right to challenge the order&#039;s correctness in the future. The court stressed providing fair opportunities for the assessee throughout the assessment process and allowed the respondents to proceed in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>