<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1232 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350077</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the rectification application, amending the Final Order to direct the original authority to consider the eligibility of input services for a 100% CENVAT credit refund under Rule 6(5) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal found that the disputed services were covered under the rule and used for both taxable and exempted services, entitling them to full credit refund. The decision was supported by a previous judgment, leading to the amendment of the Final Order to address the mistake and grant the applicant&#039;s claim for refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:33:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1232 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350077</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the rectification application, amending the Final Order to direct the original authority to consider the eligibility of input services for a 100% CENVAT credit refund under Rule 6(5) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal found that the disputed services were covered under the rule and used for both taxable and exempted services, entitling them to full credit refund. The decision was supported by a previous judgment, leading to the amendment of the Final Order to address the mistake and grant the applicant&#039;s claim for refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>