https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350070 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and setting aside the Commissioner's order. It held that the appellant complied with Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules by using the goods in the trial run for manufacturing purposes, entitling them to Cenvat Credit. Despite the goods becoming waste during the trial production, the benefit could not be denied. The decision was based on the interpretation of the rules and past precedents, ultimately favoring the appellant in the dispute over availing Cenvat Credit for goods used in trial production. en-us Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:30:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350070 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and setting aside the Commissioner's order. It held that the appellant complied with Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules by using the goods in the trial run for manufacturing purposes, entitling them to Cenvat Credit. Despite the goods becoming waste during the trial production, the benefit could not be denied. The decision was based on the interpretation of the rules and past precedents, ultimately favoring the appellant in the dispute over availing Cenvat Credit for goods used in trial production. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350070