<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1223 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350068</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the miscellaneous application for changing the company&#039;s name in the cause title of the appeal from M/s Met Trade India Ltd. to Metenere Ltd. In the refund claim case under Notification No. 56/2002-CE, the tribunal held that duty paid on assessable value inclusive of freight is eligible for a refund. Citing relevant precedents, the tribunal found that duty paid on assessable value inclusive of outward freight for FOR sales is refundable. As the appellant&#039;s clearances were on a FOR basis without separate freight charges, the tribunal granted relief by setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:29:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1223 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350068</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the miscellaneous application for changing the company&#039;s name in the cause title of the appeal from M/s Met Trade India Ltd. to Metenere Ltd. In the refund claim case under Notification No. 56/2002-CE, the tribunal held that duty paid on assessable value inclusive of freight is eligible for a refund. Citing relevant precedents, the tribunal found that duty paid on assessable value inclusive of outward freight for FOR sales is refundable. As the appellant&#039;s clearances were on a FOR basis without separate freight charges, the tribunal granted relief by setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>