<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1453 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195439</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the exclusion of certain comparables and inclusion of others based on functional dissimilarity and related party transactions. The Tribunal also addressed discrepancies in credit card expenditure, resulting in a reduced addition. The appeals were partly allowed, with specific directions for recomputation of the arm&#039;s length price.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:26:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1453 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195439</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the exclusion of certain comparables and inclusion of others based on functional dissimilarity and related party transactions. The Tribunal also addressed discrepancies in credit card expenditure, resulting in a reduced addition. The appeals were partly allowed, with specific directions for recomputation of the arm&#039;s length price.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>