<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1261 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195449</link>
    <description>Product development expenses incurred for repeated testing, validation and improvement of existing products were treated as revenue expenditure because they did not create a new asset or product and formed part of the regular business process. Transfer pricing adjustment was held to be confined to international transactions with associated enterprises, and margins under TNMM had to be computed on a consistent operating-cost and operating-revenue base for both the assessee and comparables. Unsuitable public sector comparables were excluded, risk adjustment was recognised for a captive service provider, leased line cost allocation based on consistent usage was accepted, and a comparable rejected for lack of public data was to be verified. A warranty provision made on a scientific basis against an existing business liability was allowable as a deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:26:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=494072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1261 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195449</link>
      <description>Product development expenses incurred for repeated testing, validation and improvement of existing products were treated as revenue expenditure because they did not create a new asset or product and formed part of the regular business process. Transfer pricing adjustment was held to be confined to international transactions with associated enterprises, and margins under TNMM had to be computed on a consistent operating-cost and operating-revenue base for both the assessee and comparables. Unsuitable public sector comparables were excluded, risk adjustment was recognised for a captive service provider, leased line cost allocation based on consistent usage was accepted, and a comparable rejected for lack of public data was to be verified. A warranty provision made on a scientific basis against an existing business liability was allowable as a deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>