https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195450 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and dismissed the writ petition challenging the notifications authorizing the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) investigation. The Court held that the accused cannot dictate who investigates the offences they are charged with, and there is no legal requirement to provide reasons for entrusting the investigation to the CBI in the notifications. The CBI was directed to continue the investigation with the State Government's consent and in accordance with the law, upholding the validity of the CBI investigation without the need to record reasons for further investigation in the notifications. en-us Mon, 07 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:26:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195450 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and dismissed the writ petition challenging the notifications authorizing the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) investigation. The Court held that the accused cannot dictate who investigates the offences they are charged with, and there is no legal requirement to provide reasons for entrusting the investigation to the CBI in the notifications. The CBI was directed to continue the investigation with the State Government's consent and in accordance with the law, upholding the validity of the CBI investigation without the need to record reasons for further investigation in the notifications. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195450