https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195450 A statutory notification extending Delhi Special Police Establishment jurisdiction need not record reasons on its face, because Sections 5 and 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 do not require the reasons for consent or extension to be stated in the notification; the notification was therefore not invalid on that ground. The accused has no vested right to be heard on the choice of investigating agency, and natural justice does not apply to that decision. Further investigation by the CBI was permissible under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 where the earlier police investigation was unsatisfactory and the final report had not yet been accepted. en-us Mon, 07 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:26:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195450 A statutory notification extending Delhi Special Police Establishment jurisdiction need not record reasons on its face, because Sections 5 and 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 do not require the reasons for consent or extension to be stated in the notification; the notification was therefore not invalid on that ground. The accused has no vested right to be heard on the choice of investigating agency, and natural justice does not apply to that decision. Further investigation by the CBI was permissible under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 where the earlier police investigation was unsatisfactory and the final report had not yet been accepted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 07 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195450